Friday, September 25, 2009

UN conference on Global Warming - Was it successful?

On 22nd September 2009, government leaders representing about 100 nations gathered at the United Nations in New York to discuss global warming. The meeting was billed as an attempt to jump-start negotiations in advance of a December summit in Copenhagen at which a global treaty governing greenhouse gas emissions is to be produced.

Instead, the New York conference only served to highlight the impossibility of realizing even the most limited environmental reforms in a world order dominated by rival capitalist nation states.

Global warming is caused by carbon dioxide emissions created in the burning of fossil fuels. Carbon and other “greenhouse gases” trap heat in the atmosphere, increasing the earth’s temperature beyond normal climatological fluctuations. Among global warming’s observed effects are the melting of the polar ice caps, which threatens coastal populations due to rising sea levels, and an increase in the severity of weather patterns. Its impact on the earth’s species, food production, water supply and human disease will be dramatic.

In light of the gathering threat of environmental catastrophe, the inability of the world heads of state to agree on even modest measures to meet it is all the more glaring. The conference revealed sharp divisions among the world’s three largest greenhouse gas producers, the US, China, and Europe.

China and the US by themselves produce 40 percent of all carbon emissions. The two nations, whose economies are also tightly bound together, have refused to agree to mandates on emission reductions. The speeches of presidents Barack Obama and Hu Jintao, both of whom addressed the UN gathering, were therefore watched with particular interest.

Obama’s remarks were typical of the president. The speech had nothing to say about what the US might do to reduce its emissions.

“Yes, the developed nations that caused much of the damage to our climate over the last century still have a responsibility to lead,” Obama said. “And we will continue to do so by investing in renewable energy, promoting greater efficiency, and slashing our emissions to reach the targets we set for 2020 and our long-term goal for 2050.”

In fact, the US has taken no significant measures to reduce its carbon emissions. The US is not a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol of 1997, after Congress, on cue from major corporate polluters, refused to ratify the treaty. The US is the only major country not to pass Kyoto.

Obama did not use his UN speech to call on the the US Senate to produce a greenhouse gas emissions bill in advance of the Copenhagen meeting. To be ratified, any treaty would require a 67-vote Senate majority.

Obama favors a “free market” solution to global warming, or so-called “cap and trade” measures, which would provide rich incentives to corporations to modestly reduce carbon emissions, while turning pollution into a tradeable commodity. Such a bill was passed in the House in June, but has been held up in the Senate until some time next year. (See "US House passes Obama administration’s carbon trading legislation".)

The only difference that Obama’s speech enunciated from the previous American position was an acceptance that global warming is, in fact, taking place and that it is caused by human activity. This Obama referred to as an “historic recognition on behalf of the American people and their government [that] we understand the gravity of the climate threat...” George W. Bush, Obama’s obscurantist predecessor in the White House, notoriously declared that “all the science isn’t in yet” on global warming.

Yet, in his speech’s only substantive portion, Obama reiterated the Bush administration position that combating carbon emissions is the responsibility of developing industrial powers like China and India. “Those rapidly-growing developing nations that will produce nearly all the growth in global carbon emissions in the decades ahead must do their part as well,” Obama said.

Given that China and India are rapidly growing economies, it is unsurprising that their carbon emissions are also growing rapidly. But they still lag far behind the US in per capita carbon production. While the US produces about the same amount of carbon as China, it has less than a fourth of China’s population.

There is little doubt that China’s rapid industrial expansion is creating an environmental disaster. Much of China’s energy consumption comes from burning coal, which produces carbon emissions at a higher rate than other fossil fuels.

Hu tacitly rejected the American president’s claim that developing countries must shoulder the burden for reducing carbon emissions. “Developing countries need to strike a balance between economic growth, social development and environmental protection,” Hu said.

Hu indicated that China would continue to increase its carbon emissions, saying only that greenhouse gas output would decrease relative to economic growth. Hu also said that China would begin a large-scale reforestation project, increase its consumption of non-fossil fuels, and develop a “green economy.”

The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, addressed the meeting on behalf of the European nations, which “have grown increasingly frustrated with Mr. Obama for not investing more political capital in the climate agenda at home,” the British daily Telegraph notes.

Sarkozy used his speech to take a swipe at Obama, telling the gathered heads of state he would not “inflict” a “grandiose speech” on delegates when “concrete proposals” are required.

Sub-Saharan African and poor island nations, which are already suffering under the effects of global warming and which produce relatively negligible amounts of carbon, are requesting financial reparations from the wealthier nations primarily responsible for global warming.

The French environment minister, Jean-Louis Borloo, went out of his way to reject such a proposal. “They have to show what it will pay for,” he said.

It is clear that if any agreement is produced at December’s Copenhagen gathering, it will be a derisory response to the crisis of global warming.

To date, major industrialized nations have agreed to reduce emissions by 2050. This date is so far in the future, and the promises to reduce emissions so vague, that it is not taken seriously. The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has proposed a short-term target of reducing emissions by 25 percent to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. This reduction, which environmental groups say is insufficient to reverse global warming, is likely to be opposed by the US as well as China and India, which reject emission mandates.

There are also unresolved disagreements over what body should oversee compliance with carbon emission standards.

Ban Ki-Moon, the UN secretary general, who called the climate change summit, lamented that “negotiations were moving as fast as a glacier.”

Slower, perhaps, than the world’s glaciers are melting.


ninest123 Ninest said...

ninest123 12.03
mulberry, hollister, nike free pas cher, true religion jeans, polo ralph lauren, sac burberry, vanessa bruno, coach outlet store online, north face, michael kors pas cher, converse pas cher, lululemon outlet online, nike free, ralph lauren, sac guess, true religion outlet, abercrombie and fitch, hogan outlet, sac hermes, ray ban pas cher, sac longchamp pas cher, coach factory outlet, longchamp, hollister, timberland, vans pas cher, air max, air max pas cher, michael kors uk, louboutin, air jordan, nike huaraches, nike roshe, true religion jeans, michael kors, north face, longchamp, polo lacoste, nike roshe run pas cher, new balance pas cher, air max, ray ban sunglasses, nike air max, nike tn, true religion outlet, nike air force, coach purses, michael kors outlet, nike blazer, oakley pas cher, nike trainers

ninest123 Ninest said...

air max, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton outlet, cheap uggs, prada outlet, louis vuitton, gucci outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, chanel handbags, tiffany and co, ugg boots clearance, burberry outlet, louboutin outlet, polo ralph lauren, rolex watches, michael kors outlet, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet online sale, ray ban sunglasses, jordan shoes, replica watches, michael kors outlet, oakley sunglasses, air max, nike shoes, louboutin shoes, michael kors outlet, longchamp handbags, prada handbags, uggs, louis vuitton outlet, burberry outlet, louboutin, cheap oakley sunglasses, oakley sunglasses cheap, ray ban sunglasses, longchamp outlet, longchamp handbags, nike free, michael kors outlet, tory burch outlet, louis vuitton outlet stores, ugg outlet, christian louboutin, oakley sunglasses, uggs outlet, louis vuitton handbags, tiffany and co, michael kors outlet

ninest123 Ninest said...

soccer jerseys, celine handbags, hollister clothing store, iphone 5s cases, ipad cases, louboutin, gucci, converse, nike roshe run, iphone 6 plus cases, new balance shoes, jimmy choo outlet, abercrombie and fitch, abercrombie, vans, bottega veneta, iphone 6s plus cases, birkin bag, instyler, asics running shoes, herve leger, ghd, s6 case, ralph lauren, vans shoes, nfl jerseys, iphone cases, baseball bats, wedding dresses, reebok outlet, mac cosmetics, ray ban, valentino shoes, giuseppe zanotti, timberland boots, insanity workout, mcm handbags, north face outlet, north face jackets, chi flat iron, ferragamo shoes, air max, beats by dre, babyliss pro, lululemon outlet, soccer shoes, mont blanc, iphone 6s cases, p90x, air max, iphone 6 cases, oakley

ninest123 Ninest said...

canada goose, swarovski crystal, louis vuitton uk, moncler, toms shoes, ugg boots, juicy couture, karen millen, rolex watches, moncler, ugg pas cher, pandora charms, sac louis vuitton, louis vuitton, canada goose uk, converse shoes, pandora jewelry, moncler, moncler, sac lancel, juicy couture outlet, moncler, supra shoes, thomas sabo, moncler, barbour, doke gabbana, sac louis vuitton, ugg, canada goose jackets, coach outlet store online, canada goose, canada goose, swarovski, pandora jewelry, ugg, moncler, canada goose, links of london, canada goose, canada goose outlet, montre homme, pandora charms, hollister, barbour, moncler outlet, marc jacobs, louis vuitton, wedding dresses, ugg
ninest123 12.03

Cran Kate said...

Michael Kors Outlet Ralph Lauren Outlet Gucci Factory Outlet Gucci Outlet Gucci Handbags Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses North Face Jackets Prada Outlet Burberry Outlet Hollister Clothing Ferragamo Shoes Tiffany Jewelry Tiffany Outlet NFL Jerseys Cheap Jordans Oakley Outlet North Face Outlet Burberry Outlet Ray Ban Sunglasses
Chan Luu Sale Toms Outlet Burberry Outlet Oakley Sunglasses Toms Shoes Sale Beats By Dr Dre Coach Outlet Christian Louboutin Shoes Oakley Sunglasses Valentino Shoes
Oakley Eyeglasses Michael Kors Outlet Coach Factory Outlet Coach Outlet Online Coach Purses Kate Spade Outlet Toms Shoes North Face Outlet Coach Outlet Gucci Belt

Cran Kate said...

Burberry Belt Tory Burch Boots Louis Vuitton Belt Ferragamo Belt Marc Jacobs Handbags Lululemon Outlet Christian Louboutin Shoes True Religion Outlet Tommy Hilfiger Outlet
Michael Kors Outlet Coach Outlet Red Bottoms Kevin Durant Shoes New Balance Outlet Adidas Outlet Coach Outlet Online Stephen Curry Jersey Vans Outlet Ralph Lauren Outlet
Ugg Boots Sale UGGS For Women Skechers Go Walk Adidas Yeezy Boost Adidas Yeezy Adidas NMD Coach Outlet North Face Outlet Ralph Lauren Outlet Puma Outlet Polo Outlet
Under Armour Outlet Under Armour Hoodies Herve Leger MCM Belt Nike Air Max Louboutin Heels Jordan Retro 11 Converse Outlet Nike Roshe Run UGGS Outlet North Face Outlet

aaa kitty20101122 said...

michael kors outlet
kobe sneakers
chrome hearts
adidas stan smith shoes
adidas gazelle
adidas neo
Kanye West shoes
michael kors outlet online

New and Renewable Energy

New and Renewable Energy
Your source for the New and Renewable Energy News and Technologies